When “Education Non-Profits” Attack: WakeEd Partnership – #nced #asrc #ncga

Government here to help common coreCommon Core loving educrats and big biz are coming out of the woodwork these days in North Carolina.

First it was the clueless Wake County School Board stomping their foot and attacking parents who advocated for their child. Then it was the News and Observer’s equally clueless and insulting Editorial board.

Now it’s yet another “education non-profit” racing to protect a set of experimental and fundamentally flawed standards.

Last night over at the News and Observer, an article dropped about  “education non-profit” WakeEd Partnership’s outrage that the NC Common Core Commission might actually be fulfilling their assigned task.

The News and Observer article linked to a newsletter entitled, ‘How To Advocate for Common Core‘.  It was both a hilarious and annoying read at the same time.

Hilarious because WakeEd Partnership is clearly as clueless about Common Core as the Wake County School Board.

Annoying because much of what their newsletter contained was misinformation and, frankly, a fine example of hyperbolic bullying.

I find the faux outrage that follows in this newsletter hilarious given you haven’t bothered to give a crap until it looked like this commission might actually be performing the job given to them. The subtext here is, ‘how dare citizens actually exercise their rights by contacting their representation to act!?

Let’s dissect the newsletter, shall we?

“The North Carolina Academic Standards Review Commission is assessing the state’s reading and math standards. They’ve been working since January, and they have two more meetings to complete their work.  The recommendations they make will go the State Board of Education.”

Uh , Guys? The Academic Standards Review Commission (ASRC) has been meeting  for over a year. Their first meeting was in September, 2014. I didn’t see any of you there nor have I seen any WakeEd Partnership staff at a single meeting since. Come to think of it, I don’t believe WakeEd Partnership was at the legislative hearings back in 2013. I could be wrong, but I don’t recall their name coming up during that time.

 

“North Carolina’s current standards are based on the Common Core. WakeEd believes it is critical to maintain high standards that prepare students for career and college success and that are aligned with assessments that provide a way to compare our performance to other states.”

True and False.
Yes, our state uses Common Core right now.

No, Common Core is not ‘high standards’ nor is there any proof that it is – in fact, there is proof to the contrary in multiple years of stagnant and declining test scores, test opt outs, and the boom nationwide of parents yanking their kids out to do homeschooling. Not to mention the story behind the Common Core’s invalid validation committee.

No, there is no proof they prepare kids for ‘college and career success’. By the way, define ‘college and career success’ for us, will you, WakeEd Partnership?

No, the aligned assessments have not allowed for comparison in other states. We’ll get to that as we continue here. However, the key promise of Common Core was that type of comparison and the delivery of that promise has been an utter failure.

 

“The commission was asked to recommend modifications.”

Mostly False.
WakeEd Partnership clearly hasn’t read SB 812 nor have they paid attention to its author, Sen. Jerry Tillman. Tillman has stated many times that the purpose of the bill was to repeal and replace Common Core via the formation of the Academic Standards Review Commission.  While some line items may be similar, the goal was to make recommendations for a full overhaul which will make North Carolina’s standards unique and high reaching.

 

“Another concern: teachers shared a lack of alignment between the standards and assessments.  One way the Commission can help is to call for high-quality aligned assessments.  The recommendation can be made to the State Board of Education, and the State Board of Education will take the recommendation to the state legislature.

Why?  Because in 2013, the legislature decreed that no assessments aligned to the common core could be purchased or implemented without General Assembly legislation to authorize the purchase.

That’s right.  The General Assembly gets to decide when the State Board of Education can direct the Deparment of Public Instruction to implement assessments aligned to the standards currently in place.”

OH NOES… Yeah, and?
Looking out for the fiscal welfare of the state is a big part of their job?  Clearly, the State Board of Ed and DPI weren’t doing that when they adopted Common Core and entered into an arguably illegal interstate compact via the associated testing consortia.

The legislature wisely cut off funding for the Smarter Balance Assessment  Consortium (SBAC) just prior to the General Assembly’s Legislative Research Committee on Common Core.  The SBAC test costs were triple what North Carolina currently was using.

I guess WakeEd Partnership is unaware that DPI did an SBAC pilot test in 2013? The cost of that pilot test or how it was paid for is still unknown. WakeEd Partnership are also seemingly unaware that the NC EOC and EOG for math and English are Common Core aligned? Are they also clueless that the ACT and the SAT are also Common Core aligned?

Going one step further on testing, if Common Core does what supporters claim it does, then logic dictates that kids should be knocking it out of the park on the old tests, right? Creating a new ‘aligned’ test is arguably a good idea, however it does ensure that testing companies will maintain their profit margins so long as the test is ‘rigorous’ enough.

Evidence has shown that both the SBAC test and sister test, the PARCC, are poorly written and scores have been atrocious for years. This has prompted states to dump these two consortia like hot potatoes.  Heck, states are now even suing to get out of these consortia. CC ED Potemkin VillageEven North Carolina has altered it’s membership in the SBAC.  Go figure.

By the way, from what is in WakeEd Partnership’s IRS 990’s  — they appear to be more of a lobbyist group masquerading as a ‘education advocacy  non-profit’.

Yay, another Common Core Potemkin Village!

For fiscal year ending June 2013, their 990 showed revenue of $724, 652 but expenditures of $739,060. That’s a net loss of $14,408. The prior year, they were down $63,765.

Where do they spend their money?

Fun parting fact: Wake County Superintendent, Jim Merrill, is on their board of directors right next to SAS’s Common Core Cheerleader, Caroline McCullen. Convenient, right?

Stay Tuned – I’m not done with this big biz, Common Core loving “education non-profit”.

 


Related Reading

Posted in A.P. Dillon (LL1885), Common Core | Tagged , , | 6 Comments

UNC BOG President Selected: Margaret Spellings – #ncpol #unc #bog

After a bit of a rough-and-tumble, politically charged process, the President of the UNC Board of Governors has been chosen.   John Fennebresque is out.  Spellings is in.

Yes, Former Bush Education Ed Secretary and overseer of the failed No Child Left Behind, Margaret Spellings, will be the new head of the UNC system and will pull down $775,000 over five years for the role.

How coincidental is it that Spellings gets the job just prior to a presidential election year? And unanimously to boot. With a bachelor’s degree in political science and Jeb! on the ticket, it’s probably not that coincidental.

Spellings, by her own account and history, appears to mainly be a domestic policy wonk, serving as Bush’s Domestic Policy adviser from 2001-2005,  and is a  “mother-earth type Republican“.

Point of interest from her own bio at the Bush Center:

“Previously Spellings was president and CEO of Margaret Spellings and Company, a Washington, D.C. consulting firm that provided strategic guidance to philanthropic and private sector organizations. She also served as a senior advisor to the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and was president of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce Foundation.”

Spellings was also named ‘senior adviser’ to the Boston Consulting group in 2009.  Boston Consulting Group has had one or two bugaboos since Spellings joined them.

Her resume lists many more ‘Boards and Advisory groups’, including the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation Education Advisory Board,  of which she apparently still sits on.  That probably meshes well with her ties as a former President of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, which has been a water carrier for the Gates Foundation financed Common Core.

Spellings was Ed Secretary from 2005-2009. Her bio at the US Dept. of Education is still archived. Given the flop of NCLB and subsequent failing of Common Core, it is a bit ironic that this quote that kicks it off her bio:

“We cannot prepare students for the global economy if we don’t get them to grade level first.”
— Secretary Margaret Spellings 

Hindsight is 20/20, but ouch.

Let’s finish with a bit on her own private company, Margaret Spellings & Company. Google the company for a website, you won’t find one easily.

Margaret Spellings and Company  is (or was?) a private company – Apparently, very private. According to the Bloomberg profile for Margaret Spellings & Company, there used to be a website located at “MargaretSpellings.com“. Now that page says, ‘Come back Later’.

Using the Wayback Machine, it looks like the website went dead around February of  2014. The last capture of the active website for MargaretSpellings.com was on January 6th, 2014.

That address for Margaret Spellings & Company is  1333 New Hampshire Avenue NW, Suite 601, Washington, DC. That is right on the edge of the very pricey Dupont Circle.


Related Reading:

Margaret’s Manifesto…

Tillis and Burr Applaud Selection of Margaret Spellings

Posted in A.P. Dillon (LL1885), EDUCATION, Higher Ed | 1 Comment

Mathematician and Author Responds to #WCPSS Board – #NCed #StopCC

In case you missed it, last week the Wake County School Board showed just how clueless they are about Common Core.

The Wake County board dove in front of Common Core by attacking parents in their own district who dared to advocate for their child in front of the Academic Standards Review Commission last week.

Common Core math 7 plus 8The News and Observer reported the comments of some of the board members.

I went and matched up those comments to the Wake Board’s video of their work session. After seeing the video, I might have been too kind using the term ‘clueless’.

The News and Observer Editorial staff then doubled down on the Wake Board’s comments and said that Common Core was not to be blamed — Teachers, parents and kids were.

Barry Garelick is has a degree in math from the University of Michigan and the author of a book that through anecdotes reveals the failings of math under Common Core. The book is called Teaching Math in the 21st Century and I highly recommend it.

I’ve also blogged about Garelick’s multi-part article series that deconstructs the math under Common Core .

Garelick weighed in on the comments on the News and Observer article:

Currently, with the adoption and implementation of the Common Core math standards, there has been increased emphasis and focus on students showing “understanding” of the conceptual underpinnings of algorithms and problem-solving procedures. Instead of adding multi-digit numbers using the standard algorithm and learning alternative strategies after mastery of that algorithm is achieved, students must do the opposite. That is, they are required to use inefficient strategies that purport to provide the “deep understanding” when they are finally taught to use the more efficient standard algorithm. The prevailing belief is that to do otherwise is to teach by rote without understanding. Students are also being taught to reproduce explanations that make it appear they possess understanding – and more importantly, to make such demonstrations on the standardized tests that require them to do so.

Such an approach is tantamount to saying, “If we can just get them to do things that look like what we imagine a mathematician does, then they will be real mathematicians.” Forcing students to think of multiple ways to solve a problem, for example, or to write an explanation for how they solved a problem or why something works does not in and of itself cause understanding. It is investment in the wrong thing at the wrong time.

The “explanations” most often will have little mathematical value and are naïve because students don’t know the subject matter well enough. The result is at best a demonstration of “rote understanding” – it is a student engaging in the exercise of guessing (or learning) what the teacher wants to hear and repeating it. At worst, it undermines the procedural fluency that students need.

Understanding, critical thinking, and problem solving come when students can draw on a strong foundation of domain content relevant to the topic being learned. As students (non-Learning Disabled as well as Learning Disabled) establish a larger repertoire of mastered knowledge and methods, the more articulate they become in explanations.

While some educators argue that procedures and standard algorithms are “rote”, they fail to see that exercising procedures to solve problems requires reasoning with such procedures – which in itself is a form of understanding. This form of understanding is particularly significant for students with LD, and definitely more useful than requiring explanations that students do not understand for procedures they cannot perform.


Related Reading:

Posted in A.P. Dillon (LL1885), Academic Standards Review Commission, Common Core, Wake County School Board | Tagged , , | 2 Comments

On ACT Test Results… I Told You So. – #nced #stopcc

In early September, I reported on North Carolina’s ACT scores. They were dismal.

Flashback:

There is the capability to sort this ACT chart and North Carolina’s “College Readiness” benchmark scores, compared to the rest of the nation, were near the bottom of the pile in nearly every category.

  • Composite Benchmark score nationally was 21 and NC’s was 19, which was third from last place. If you discount Hawaii, who doesn’t test 100% of their students, North Carolina was tied for last with Mississippi.
  • English Benchmark score nationally was 64 and NC’s was 47, which was also third from last place.
  • Reading Benchmark  score nationally was 46. NC scored a 34 which was fourth from last place.
  • Math Benchmark score nationally was 41 and NC scored a 32. NC tied with Kentucky (Common Core’s first adopter) and only 5 states scored lower than us.
  • Science Benchmark nationally was a 38 and NC scored 26 with three states scoring lower than us.

In all five areas, North Carolina ACT scores have taken a nose dive since 2011.

Back in September, I also mused that, “minorities, in particular African-American students, have been hardest hit.  Given the historical results, one has to ask, is Common Core racially biased?”

A recent  article by Dr. Berry at Breitbart picked up on the minority theme and cites ACT’s own report:

ACT also noted that “readiness levels remain weakest among underserved minority groups.”

“African American, American Indian, Hispanic and native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander students trail far behind their white and Asian peers in readiness in each of the four subject areas,” states ACT, “as is also true in college enrollment and graduation rates—with no signs of closing those gaps.”

Indeed. In fact, the gaps are widening. But local media and the Wake School Board won’t even think about blaming Common Core; it can’t be at fault.

The Breitbart article continues and specifically cites Common Core’s first adopter, Kentucky. The article quotes Richard Inness of the Bluegrass Institute on the Kentucky ACT Scores:

For sure, what the ACT data tells us isn’t so rosy…

Overall, ACT test results show only 21 percent of all Kentucky’s graduates, public, private and home school combined, were fully prepared for a liberal arts college education with adequate skills in English, math, reading and science.

That’s all!

Just 21 percent!

The situation looks far grimmer when we review how Kentucky’s racial minorities fared.

  • Only one in 20 black students – just five percent – were fully ready for college. That gruesome figure is unchanged from last year.
  • A not much higher percentage of Hispanics, just 14 percent, were prepared, as well.

Overall, these data points just don’t mesh with claims from the Kentucky Department of Education that more than half our kids are being prepared for college. What kind of college are they being prepared for? Certainly not the kind the ACT, Inc. has in mind.

There’s that minority student theme again.  I suspect, if one looked, they would find this to be the case in nearly every Common Core state.

I find this reference back to Kentucky really interesting, since Kentucky was thrust upon the NC Common Core Academic Standards Review Commission back in February as a ‘shining example’ of ‘successful community engagement’.jesus invalid argument
Shining example? More like lipstick on a pig. This is the result that comes from a set of standards or label of ‘college ready’ that has never been validated.

Dr. Rebecca Blessing was the emissary from Kentucky.

I am told by reliable sources she was granted permission to address the commission at the suggestion of DPI and Pro-Common Core Business interests like the NC Chamber of Commerce.

Read the whole article by Dr. Berry. She also covers the failings of Common Core math, citing Innes, Dr. Milgram and Ze’ev Wurman.


Related Reading:

WCPSS: All Aboard the ‘Equity’ Train

Post-Mortem of February NC Common Core Commmission Meeting

Posted in Academic Standards Review Commission, Common Core | Tagged , , | 2 Comments

Explaining the Common Core Review Committee – [Video] #StuffAtkinsonSays

In August of 2014, NC Superintendent Atkinson appeared in a video ‘explaining’ the review to take place in NC on Common Core.  This is just one excerpt from that video.

In the clip, Atkinson talks about ‘all the hard work’ teachers have put in creating resources and curriculum. Gee, why did they have to work so hard? She also makes the revelation about how Common Core is taught.

WATCH:

More #StuffAtkinsonSays each week. Stay tuned!


Related Reading:

Posted in A.P. Dillon (LL1885), Common Core, ELECTIONS, EXCLUSIVE, June Atkinson | Tagged | 2 Comments

#DM7 Article: Webb Out, Biden Out and What Difference Does It Make

This is a repost of my weekly Da Tech Guy Column:

Webb Out, Biden Out and What Difference Does It Make 


By A.P. Dillon

Hillary was in front of the Benghazi panel. Her avowed enemies sat on the other side, asking the questions. But what difference does it make?

As we saw with the first Democrat debate, there was a lot of yelling, socialism and talk of ‘free stuff’.  I’m going to go ahead and say the second debate will be more of the same and will feature Hillary Clinton trying to one-up Bernie Sanders on just how far Left she can really go. Someone ought to bring a limbo bar.

On October 20th, we saw Jim Webb drop out of the Democrat pack. On his way out the door, he sent off a parting shot at Hillary Clinton who during the debate called Republicans ‘the enemy’. Webb said,  “The other party’s not the enemy. They’re the opposition.”

The very next day, Vice President Biden ended his annoyingly long period soul-searching on whether or not to run. Biden pretty much repeated what Webb said.  Sensing a theme here?

Here’s part of his remarks announcing his non-candidacy:

“I believe we have to end the divisive partisan politics that is ripping this country apart. And I think we can. It’s mean-spirited. It’s petty. And it’s gone on for much too long. I don’t believe like some do that it’s naive to talk to Republicans. I don’t think that we should look at Republicans as our enemies. They are opposition, they’re not our enemies. For the sake of the country, we have to work together.”

This, from the Vice President of the most divisive administration in our country’s history, with a President who has refused to work with Republicans from day one.

‘We have to work together’
Right. Divisive VP, heal thyself.
Joe, in 2014 you said ‘there is no Republican party’ and ‘Democrats would benefit from having a viable negotiating partner’.  This is just one of dozens of examples.

Biden went on to talk about “compromise“, the emphasis added is mine:

“As the President has said many times  before, compromise is not a dirty word. But look at it this way, folks – how does this country function without consensus? How can we move forward without being able to arrive at consensus? Four more years of this kind of pitched battle may be more than this country can take.  We have to change it.”

‘Compromise’ 
I’m old enough to remember Obama’s Sequester.

‘Four more years’
Wait, did Joe just slam Obama (and himself) with the POTUS standing right next to him?
I think he did. We re-elected ‘Hope and Change‘ and received more of the same eternal ‘crisis’ du jour and divisive rhetoric. In August,  71% of Americans were saying they are unhappy with the direction the country is going in. Biden running would ensure another four years of that wrong direction and that  ‘pitched battle’, so he’s tossing the hot potato to Hillary. Po-tay-toe, Po-tah-toe.

‘We have to change it’  
So, not getting in the race to stop Hillary from being four more years of Obama style divisiveness is the answer? Don’t forget all the racial healing this administration promised us yet delivered the exact opposite.  Where’s that YES WE CAN, Joe?

So, now the Democrats have lost the one candidate who is probably best suited to actually do what Biden is suggesting needs to be done. That figured.

What we’re left with is a Socialist and a Serial Liar in the top spots. There’s also a pompous,  Ivory Tower Elitist, and two reasonably ineffectual Governors. One of which had only 10 people considered major donors to his campaign.

YES THEY CAN!

 

DM7 small LL1885A.P. Dillon resides in the Triangle area of North Carolina and is the founder of LadyLiberty1885.com.
Her current and past writing can also be found at IJ Review, StopCommonCoreNC.org, Heartland.org and Watchdog Wire NC.
Catch her on Twitter: @LadyLiberty1885

Posted in A.P. Dillon (LL1885), ELECTIONS | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on #DM7 Article: Webb Out, Biden Out and What Difference Does It Make