This page serves as an archive of documents, resources, and articles on Leandro v. State of North Carolina and articles tagged “Leandro” on this website.
The Leandro case began in 1994 with a lawsuit centering on the state’s constitutional duty to provide an “opportunity for a sound basic education” to all public school students.
The name Leandro comes from one of the original plaintiffs, Robb Leandro, a former Hoke County high school student. The majority of Leandro’s over 20-year history was overseen by Judge Howard Manning but was reassigned to Judge David Lee in 2016.
The law firm of Parker Poe was asked by five low-wealth county school districts to handle the case. Families from five of those counties were original plaintiffs.
The main claim was that the state was not giving children the same educational opportunities in all districts. A key point was that the formula used for funding public education put low-wealth districts at a financial disadvantage because of the disparity in revenues school districts receive from local property taxes.
Leandro is over 20 years old and is extremely complex. The following milestones are not representative of the entire case picture.
A decent historical summary can be found at NCbar.org. The summary is dated, however, as studies have shown that pre-K is not as effective as initially believed.
Also useful is the 2003-04 report on Leandro II made to the NCGA’s Joint Legislative Education Oversite Committee (JLEOC).
1997: A North Carolina Court ruled that the state’s at-risk children have a fundamental right to the “opportunity to receive a sound basic education.” The ensuing trial lasted just over 14 months. One part of the ruling mandated pre-kindergarten for at-risk prospective students.
The Court defined at-risk students as students who met one of the following criteria: Member of a low-income family; live in a single parent/guardian home; parents do not have advanced educations; are enrolled in free or reduced-cost lunch programs; limited English proficiency; are a racial and/or ethnic minority.
(Leandro v. State, 346 N.C. 336, 347 (1997) (“Leandro I”).
2004: The North Carolina Supreme court upheld the previous lower court findings that a constitutional violation had happened; that at-risk children in the state were being denied their right to a “sound basic education.” The court did not agree with the lower court on pre-kindergarten mandates, calling it “premature” at that time. The Supreme Court then sent the case back down to the legislative and executive branches to come up with a solution to the constitutional violation.
(Hoke County Board of Education v. State, 358 N.C. 605, 632, 637 (2004) (“Leandro II”)
2015: In July Judge Manning announces his retirement but he kept hearing the case until Oct. 7, 2016. At that time, North Carolina Chief Justice Mark Martin reassigned Leandro to Emergency Superior Court Judge David Lee.
2017: A joint motion to hire an independent evaluator to review the case is made on the 20th anniversary of the case. At the same time, the State Board of Education filed to have themselves removed from the case. The board of education’s motion is later rejected.
2018: In February, Judge David Lee appointed WestEd to study and recommend a plan for the State to remedy the constitutional violation found in the Leandro case. WestEd was tasked with making a final report to Judge Lee by March 31, 2019.
2019: WestEd’s Leandro report is made public on December 10. The report was compiled by WestEd, Learning Policy Institute, & Friday Institute for Educational Innovation at North Carolina State University (2019). Sound Basic Education for All: An Action Plan for North Carolina. San Francisco, CA: WestEd.
(Repository of the WestEd Report and subreports)
2020: Judge Lee’s consent order is a set of basic instructions giving the lawyers involved a 60-day window to submit plans on how to implement short-term goals. It was issued on January 21. Following the Consent Decree, Gov. Roy Cooper’s partisan“Sound education commission” recommended more school funding, but wouldn’t say how much. The latest reports by Cooper’s commission are on its website.
On June 15, the joint report to the Court was published: Fiscal Year 2021 Action Plan For North Carolina. Dr. Terry Stoops of the John Locke Foundation wrote an overview of what the plan entails, including around $426M in additional spending, for Carolina Journal on June 18.
In late August, the original judge in the case, Judge Manning, sat down for an interview where he blasted the idea that WestEd’s massive spending plan was going to make any difference.
“I realized money can’t buy you quality…You don’t just raise everybody’s salaries by $10,000 per year and expect to have all the grades go up by 20% because it’s not going to happen,” said Manning in the interview.
Sept. 1, Judge Lee signed the consent order. This puts the WestEd eight-year plan in motion with the foregone conclusion he will sign off on spending totaling $426.9 million. Of that spending, $235 million (55%) would go to just funding teacher raises.
The signing of the order comes around the same time that Education Week ranked North Carolina 15th in the nation in K-12 Achievement.
“North Carolina is also one of the most equitable states in the nation, earning a B for the “degree to which education funding is equitably distributed across the districts within a state,” writes John Locke Foundation’s Dr. Terry Stoops of the Education Week.
The day before Lee signed the order, lawmakers were made aware of his intent and issued a statement.
“Judge Manning had it exactly right when he blasted the focus on money instead of quality. Republicans have increased education funding by $1,748 per student, but that doesn’t matter if children aren’t being taught properly,” said Sen. Deanna Ballard (R-Watauga)
Ballard, who is a co-chair of the Senate Education Committee, continued “It’s so disappointing that the new Leandro judge, David Lee, wouldn’t even speak to legislators about this issue before issuing a consent order.”
WestEd is a multi-million dollar non-profit that does education research for state and federal government.
The organization also has been hired by numerous think tanks and other education non-profits and has received over $17.6 million just from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation alone.
WestEd has been called into North Carolina several times in the past, including during the 2015 fight over Common Core. (More about WestEd in NC)
Articles of Note
- Big changes proposed in 20-year-old Leandro education court case
- Leandro lawsuit, now 25 years old, continues to vex educators
- Leandro recommendations: more plans, more money, confusion
- Constitutional crisis brewing over path of WestEd recommendations?
- Consultant Hired to Recommend Billions in New Education Spending Fulfills Mandate
- Leandro consultants call for big boost in public-school spending
- NC is still not providing many children a sound basic education, judge says
- Chatter about funding may drown out other important findings
- NC Republican legislators were never contacted by WestEd for Leandro Report research
- New consent order in Leandro case sets stage for action
- Does more money for education lead to better student performance?
- Senate committee invites Leandro judge to explain how lawmakers can implement court order [View Ballard’s Letter to Judge Lee ]
- Failure to consult N.C. Republicans leads to flaws in Leandro report
- Leandro measures will fail under current governance system
- WestEd, The Courts and the State Constitution
- Leandro measures will fail under current governance system
- Judge refuses State Board’s request to be let out of Leandro lawsuit
- Shortcomings of the WestEd report: Student achievement
- Shortcomings of the WestEd report: Resources
- WestEd Report: A Review Part I
- WestEd Report: A Review Part II
- Leandro parties demand $427 million increase in education spending
- $427 million – the price of compliance?
- Landmark NC education decision marks 25 years
- Judge Lee adopts 2021 proposal for meeting the Leandro mandate; funding decision next
- Is the $427 million Leandro action plan dead on arrival in the General Assembly?
- Judge Manning interview: Money is not going to fix the problem.
- Leandro Judge Shatters The Myth That More Money Means Better Outcomes