Where ASRC Member Ann Clark Was During The January Meeting

During the January meeting of the Common Core Academic Standards Review Commission (ASRC), member Ann Clark dialed in to attend.

Ms. Clark announced she was joining the ASRC via telephone because she was out of the state… at a “national convening” on Common Core.

 

To make sure my ears had not deceived me, I emailed the Co-Chairs of the committee for more information.

I was told by Co-Chair Andre Peek that he “connected with Ann Clark regarding your question. Ann was not attending a national meeting on common core. She was participating in  an information sharing session between school superintendents where the topic came up in informal discussions with peers.”

Just to be sure of what Mr. Peek told me, I submitted a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request to Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools (CMS).   CMS replied in a timely manner.

The documentation turned over showed that Ms. Clark attended The 2015 Broad Center Forum in California.  The Broad Center as in Eli Broad Foundation; a large supporter of Common Core.

The agenda for the Forum itself does not mention Common Core. There was a great deal of ‘equity’ and ’emotional learning’ mentioned in the agenda, however.

As to why Ms. Clark specifically announced she was at a ‘national convening’ on Common Core during the call, one has to wonder what sessions went on that were not on the official agenda.

That question might go unanswered, as a search for this conference online and at the Broad Foundation site did not yield any publicly available information.

Additionally, the agenda provided in the FOIA documents had a website address on the bottom of the relevant pages. Unfortunately, the event site blocks any access to any of their events unless you have the code.

The FOIA did show that this trip cost CMS over $600 dollars in travel and other expenses.

 

 

Posted in Academic Standards Review Commission, Common Core | Tagged , | 1 Comment

Pearson Is Everywhere: PISA 2018

PearsonWelcome back to Pearson Is Everywhere!

Last time we looked at how excited Pearson was about President Obama’s “free community college proposal.

Today, we look at something I missed from December 2014. We’ll look at how Pearson is going to develop the PISA 2018 Student Assessment 21st Century Frameworks for OECD.

Excerpt from the Pearson.com Press Release:

Pearson, the world’s leading learning company, today announces that it has won a competitive tender by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) to develop the Frameworks for PISA 2018.

The Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) is widely recognized as the benchmark for evaluating education systems worldwide by assessing the skills and knowledge 15-year-old students will need in their further academic education or for joining the workforce.

PISA is administered every three years in around 70 participating economies world-wide. Representative national samples of 15 year-olds from these countries took the PISA 2012 test totaling about 510,000 students and representing about 28 million 15-year-olds globally. Similar, if not higher, numbers are expected for PISA 2015 and PISA 2018. From 2015 onward most students will take PISA by computer.

The frameworks define what will be measured in PISA 2018, how this will be reported and which approach will be chosen for the development of tests and questionnaires.  The main tasks will be to:

  • Redefine reading literacy, taking into account how young people are taught to approach the digital environment including how to recognise credible websites and online documents.
  • Review and where necessary adapt the frameworks for mathematics and science.
  • Develop the student questionnaire framework for the collection of contextual information and the measurement of other education outcomes which may have connections with performance.
  • Develop a framework for the measurement of global competence which will assess students’ awareness of the interconnected global world we live and work in and their ability to deal effectively with the
    resulting demands.

The rest is quotes, including this one from the head of  OECD; emphasis is mine:

Head of the PISA programme at the OECD Andreas Schleicher said:

“PISA 2018 has the potential to be the start of a new phase of our international assessments. We can now make much smarter use of technology in how we test young people, and we need global competence as governments around the world seek to equip young people with the skills they need for life and employment.”

Smarter use of technology? Tracking our kids globally? Yay??

Those fighting Common Core know that Common Core supporters (and test makers) used PISA scores like a shield to rationalize use of the standards.

The rationalization, boiled down, was that our country’s scores weren’t as good as other countries and that Common Core was the solution. It also has no basis in reality, since Common Core was basically a big fundamentally flawed experiment with no empirical evidence backing it.

Hilariously, Common Core math writer Jason Zimba argued that the Common Core Math would improve PISA scores.  Remember,  Jason Zimba revealed during testimony in Massachusetts that Common Core math alone will not get kids on STEM tracks into college.

Former Common Core validation committee member, Dr. Milgram, has also noted that Common Core math will set our kids back at least 2 years.

The math in the early grades has proven to be a giant disaster, with young kids being taught overly convoluted methods for very simple problems.

In the latter grades, the math sequencing has been a big issue and it has been pointed out that Common Core math will not prepare kids for a STEM path.

A big problem with proponents use of PISA is that when the data is disaggregated by the percentages of poverty in a school, the United States scores at the top over all the rest.

Also, PISA itself says their test is not to be used as a tool to rationalize sweeping educational reforms or policy changes.  Read: Dr. Christopher Tienken Explains PISA and Real Education Beyond PISA

In a nutshell, PISA attempts to compare apples to wrenches using a ruler with no markings on it.

Related:

Posted in A.P. Dillon (LL1885), Common Core, EDUCATION, Testing | Tagged , , | 2 Comments

What If They Threw A People’s Grand Jury And No One Came

What If They Threw A People’s Grand Jury And No One Came?  Well, Moral Monday threw a “people’s grand jury” yesterday.

 

Looks like no one came; not much in the way of local media. Well, maybe one media outlet outside of Moral Monday’s official Media — WRAL, who had a live stream of the charade:  

Posted in Moral Monday, Reverend Barber | Tagged | 2 Comments

#DM7 Article: The Smarter Balanced Connections

This is a reposting of my weekly Da Tech Guy column: The Smarter Balanced Connections


By A.P. Dillon

Last week, I wrote about Lamar Alexander’s ‘education’ history.  In that article, I traced Alexander’s involvement with the “New American Schools Development Corporation” and how that company was merged with the  The American Institutes for Research (AIR).

AIR is now producing Common Core tests for the Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium (SBAC).  The other outfit producing Common Core tests is The Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers (PARCC).  PARCC is run by publishing behemoth Pearson.

Both sets of test have come under fire with states pulling out of the SBAC, parents opting their kids out of the tests and, most recently, students walking out of the PARCC tests in New Mexico.  The tests are reported to be poorly written in some cases and there have been concerns over data collected by these tests and the privacy of that data.

Just yesterday, a judge in Missouri ruled that the SBAC fees in Missouri were unconstitutional. Missouri Education Watchdog reported:

Judge Green of the circuit court of Cole County has just granted summary judgment in our favor on our claim that Missouri’s membership fees to Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortia are unlawful under the Compact Clause of the U.S. Constitution as well as “state and federal law.”

Judge Green has permanently enjoined the State of Missouri from making payments in the form of membership fees to Smarter Balanced. We can no longer be a member of SBAC.

Quoting directly from the judgement, which found the SBAC participation by Missouri to be in violation of the Compact Clause of the U.S. Constitution and “unlawful under state and federal law”.

The judgement mentions the SBAC thusly, “the Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium, a.k.a. Smarter Balanced, Smarter Balanced at UCLA“.  It is worth mentioning that North Carolina is a member of the SBAC and at some point between October 2014 and January 2015, North Carolina’s status at the SBAC went from Governing State to Affiliate State.

Upon inquiring with the SBAC, I was informed this change happened because North Carolina refused to sign a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with UCLA. However, according to a statement from North Carolina’s Department of Public Instruction, the status change occurred because the state did not administer the full SBAC test in spring of 2014.

Let’s return to Lamar Alexander, who is the sponsor of S. 227Strengthening Education through Research Act (SETRA).  This bill seeks to actually increase data collection of children, including psychological profiling.  To be clear, this bill is dangerous.

SETRA depends on FERPA (Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act) to protect student data privacy. FERPA was gutted by the U.S. Department of Education and Arne Duncan in 2011 in order to let data under Common Core and the associated tests to flow freely.  That same year SBAC scored big with the the U.S. Department of Education.

When states took Race To The Top Funds and agreed to adopt Common Core, they were also required the construction of State Longitudinal Database Systems (SLDS). Under SETRA, these SLDS’s will now get even more student data.

Who benefits? Arguably education profiteers have the most to gain. Without the data, outfits like SBAC and PARCC cease to function. Perhaps Senator Alexander can comment on the bill that benefits “public and private entities,” of which his past ‘education history’ is entwined with?

Also of note is H.R. 5, The Student Success Act, which is being rushed through and promoted by Congressional representatives as the opposite of what it really is.  This bill marginalizes parental rights and local decision-making.

SETRA also claims to protect states from federal coercion related to Common Core. Pay attention to the language, the bill prevents future federal coercion. SETRA does nothing to stop the current situation.

These two bills combined represent a failure to listen and a failure to learn from the mistakes of the past. In a nutshell: Education officials and Congress still haven’t figured out our kids and their education are not data sets to be bought and sold.

The public needs to contact their Senators and their Representatives.  Now.

AP DillonA.P. Dillon resides in the Triangle area of North Carolina and is the founder ofLadyLiberty1885.com.
Her current and past writing can also be found at IJ Review, StopCommonCoreNC.org, WatchdogWireNC and WizBang. 

 

Posted in EDUCATION | Tagged | 4 Comments

About That ‘Twitter Debate Study’ WaPo And Twitchy Cite

Washington Post had an article this week about How Twitter is changing the national Common Core debate.

Michelle Malkin has been a monster on Twitter on Common Core, this is undeniable.  The moms out there tweeting everyday should also be recognized for their tremendous effort and impact.

I just wanted to remind folks about who did this ‘study’, what was really the purpose and who was contacted. Also, who didn’t consent to participate and the unanswered question of who funded this study.

Posted in A.P. Dillon (LL1885), Common Core, Twitter | 1 Comment

Video: Parents In FL Shut Down When They Criticize Curriculum

Free speech in Jeb Bush’s faux educational utopia, Florida.

Zero Hedge has an article that includes video of parents speaking out at a Naples, Florida school board workshop being shut down by the school board as they spoke out against curriculum and textbooks.

David Bolduc, a resident of Naples, Florida recently sent us a note highlighting a video in which he, and several other concerned parents, were reprimanded and treated like little children in a School Board Workshop as a result of them expressing concerns about school curriculum.
Zero Hedge

There is some background provided at Zero Hedge on the issue, which includes specific examples of parental concerns with textbooks being used, as outlined in a letter to the editor by one of the parents.

ShutupperyIn the video board chair, Kathleen Curatolo, keeps interrupting the parents telling them to ‘stick to the issues’ when their comments address any given person or even a generic group. In effect, she censors their statements.

At one point, a parent is told that if they can’t ‘abide by the rules of civility’ they will be asked to leave.

Be sure to watch the whole thing, especially the comment starting around the 3:22 mark.

Here’s the video that accompanies the article.

Related Reading:  
Parental Rights in Public School: Quickly Disappearing. Parents are Outranked by School Administrators.

“Just Who Do These People (School Administrators) Think They Are”? This Missouri Parent Wants to Know.

Posted in A.P. Dillon (LL1885), EDUCATION, Video | Tagged | 3 Comments