The Common Core Weekend Reads – 1-25-15

Umbridge Common CoreThese are the Common Core Weekend Reads for January 25th, 2015.

This is a review of the past week of news on Common Core nationwide and in North Carolina.

Articles are organized by category.

Prior Edition of Weekend Reads: 1-18-15


NC Academic Standards Review Commission (ASRC) Updates:

NC ASRC Site 
Next ASRC meeting: February 16th, 1-5 pm. Location published for February is Dept. of Administration, but January’s meeting was moved on short notice to Dept. of Public Instruction and the ASRC site has not been updated to reflect that move.

January meeting audio has been added to the meeting materials list.
Meeting Audio File 1 (mp3)
Meeting Audio File 2 (mp3)

NC UPDATES:

QUOTES OF THE WEEK:

When the state adopted the new standards, Atkinson said administrators and teachers urged the state board to move to integrated math statewide.
“We did that at the request of local school districts,” Atkinson said.
​-Journal Now, Revisions for academic math standards may be unveiled by spring
My comment on Atkinson’s statements above: PROVE IT.

​”​But there is a key difference between the brothers.

A recent article in the New Yorker magazine about Jeb Bush by Alec MacGillis, a former Washington Post reporter, looks at his educational legacy and pinpoints that difference: George W. Bush tried to help improve public schools as governor of Texas and then president (even if critics say his emphasis on standardized tests was destructive and his No Child Left Behind law was a train wreck). His brother, as governor of Texas and then as an education reform advocate nationwide, has pushed the privatization of public education.​”​
-Washington Post, Jeb vs. George W.: A key difference between the Bush brothers on school reform

LEGISLATIVE/LEGAL:

POLITICAL/PROTESTS:

HIGHLIGHTED ARTICLES:

THE WEEKEND READS:

TESTING UPDATES:

VIDEO OF THE WEEK:

TWEETS OF THE WEEK:

Posted in Common Core | Tagged | 1 Comment

About H.R.36 – Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act

Earlier this week, I was confused on what was really happening with Rep. Ellmers in NC-02 on the issue of H.R.36 – Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act.

Some parties were saying Rep. Ellmers withdrawal of her sponsorship for the bill was a flip-flop or stab in the back.

Others said Rep. Ellmers is firmly pro-life and her withdrawal was a matter of disagreeing with language added to the 2015 version of H.R. 26. These folks would be correct.

Rep. Ellmers office issued this statement yesterday, emphasis added:

WASHINGTON – Congresswoman Renee Ellmers (R-NC-02) released the below statement following today’s vote on H.R. 7 – No Taxpayer Funding for Abortion and Abortion Insurance Full Disclosure Act of 2015:

“I am proud to vote in favor H.R. 7 as it is conservative legislation that advances the pro-life cause and guarantees that no taxpayer dollars are spent funding abortion. Additionally, I will continue working with all of my colleagues to address our concerns with language in H.R. 36. Our goal is to find a way to get this legislation in its best possible form, and I remain fully committed to bringing this legislation to the House floor for a vote.”

Said language dealt with rape and mandatory reporting.

I believe this is the section (ii) under scrutiny:

`(B) Subject to subparagraph (C), subparagraph (A) does
not apply if–
“(i) in reasonable medical judgment, the abortion
is necessary to save the life of a pregnant woman whose
life is endangered by a physical disorder, physical
illness, or physical injury, including a life-
endangering physical condition caused by or arising
from the pregnancy itself, but not including
psychological or emotional conditions; or
“(ii) the pregnancy is the result of rape, or the
result of incest against a minor, if the rape has been
reported at any time prior to the abortion to an
appropriate law enforcement agency, or if the incest
against a minor has been reported at any time prior to
the abortion to an appropriate law enforcement agency
or to a government agency legally authorized to act on
reports of child abuse or neglect.

The language that upset a number of GOP women (and men) and was brought to Rep. Ellmers, as she is chair of policy committee.   It is my understanding that Rep. Ellmers then took the concerns to the leadership; multiple meetings and discussions arose, of which apparently Ellmers was not privy to some of them.

This language, from what sources tell me, was originally in the text of a ‘rule’, which was originally voted on separately. This latest incarnation of H.R. 36 had incorporated that rule text, hence the maneuvering that took place.

Some background on that ‘rule’
In 2013,  House Res. 266 was the rule where the ‘mandatory reporting language’ resided.

However, from what was explained to me, this rule was a combined rule with what would become known as the ‘Farm Bill’. What this meant was that the combined rule prohibits the ability for Members to vote against passage.

To expand on that, a no vote on this particular combined rule would have resulted in Republicans voting against a provision of the Farm bill. As Rep. Ellmers represents a strong agricultural district, there was no way they would likely have voted against this provision within the Farm Bill.

Related:

Posted in A.P. Dillon (LL1885) | Tagged | 1 Comment

Guillory’s ‘Nudge’ Article

On January 14th, I wrote about the latest education non-profit, EducationNC. In that article, I made an assertion:

Narrative keanuIt is my personal assertion that this organization is less about “nonpartisan news” in education and more about branding and steering education narratives in North Carolina with an eye towards influencing public opinion.

Time will tell, but my gut says this is a PR outfit dressed up as a non-profit. Looking at their board and supporters lends some credence to this hunch; same people, same money.

An article currently up at EducationNC by one of its founders, Ferrel Guillory, seems to be proving that assertion true. The of the article title is, Why Graduating From High School Isn’t Enough.  This article is a fine example of narrative driving. Ironically enough, the article opens with the words, “Rhetoric matters.”

A quick thought or two before proceeding.
Encouraging minorities to continue with education is not new nor should it be disparaged. Encouraging minorities to do so by shifting the playing field in the name of equity should be.  Anyone familiar with the policies of No Child Left Behind or Race To The Top knows that you cannot legislate equality of outcomes and that these initiatives lacked shooting for equity of opportunity.

Also, Guillory cites a NY Times article, The Power of A Simple Nudge, yet doesn’t link to it. Couched in the NY Times piece is the theme that government needs to be involved in a ‘brothers keeper’ style manner by using ‘nudges’ to parents.  Nudge sounds much better than behavioral modification, after all.

Yet as these debates rage, researchers have been quietly finding small, effective ways to improve education. They have identified behavioral “nudges” that prod students and their families to take small steps that can make big differences in learning. These measures are cheap, so schools or nonprofits could use them immediately.

One could argue this ‘nudge’ is less about education as it is about shaping behavior of the public at large. In terms of education, that nudge has become a deluge of money and influence peddling from businesses and corporations dictating to schools how to train their workforce.

Back to the article.

Main thrust: High school diplomas aren’t enough — students must be career ready too.
Gee, where have we heard that before?  

This ‘main thrust’ is supported from the text of the article, note the identification of minorities:

Among the findings that flow out of MDC’s work are these: The South can no longer regard high school graduation as an end-point of education, but rather a transition to more education; and inculcating a culture of higher expectations, particularly among black and Latino adolescents, is critical to elevating state and regional educational outcomes.

In addition to that ‘main thrust’ in the article is the underlying assertion that this problem is particular to or worse in the South. Anyone from cities like Chicago, Detroit, Los Angeles or New York City can tell you that it’s not.

Arguably, the South has had a target put on its back for mainly political purposes and this article is part and parcel of a larger narrative that Republicans are to blame; progressives and their allies must coordinate and turn the South blue.

In the above ‘main thrust’ passage, Guillory references MDC. Note MDC’s “living history” section on their site. That history includes a section called, “The 21st Century: Advancing Equity and Opportunity”. 

Civitas’s Mapping The Left is about to get its first use. Here is the profile for MDC at Mapping The Left:

MDC is an organization that has, for nearly 50 years, worked to end poverty in NC. Founded in 1967 out of NC Gov Terry Sanford’s North Carolina Fund the original mission of Manpower Development Corp was started with grant money from Z. Smith Reynolds.

MDC could be called one of the original community organizing groups in the South. In recent years they have branched out into issues such as the environment, immigration, education, social change and government programs such as FEMA. In a ten year period, (2003 to 2013) MDC has received $53,481,171 in grant money to end poverty. The grants can be attributed to the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, George Soros’ Foundation to Promote Open Society and North Carolina’s own Z. Smith Reynolds Foundation. Some of that money can also be attributed N.C. tax dollars from sources such as North Carolina State University, North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services and the North Carolina Rural Economic Development Center.

 

Related Reads:

 

Posted in A.P. Dillon (LL1885), EDUCATION | Tagged | 2 Comments

Civitas Introduces ‘Mapping The Left’

Right leaning think tank, Civitas has unveiled an interesting and useful tool/website: Mapping The Left.  Web address: http://mappingtheleft.com/

After tracking down what seemed to be a never-ending set of spiderweb connections that were exposed along with BlueprintNC’s attack memo, a project like this was bound to come along. And it has. 

Civitas has an introductory article on their site, in which they explain why they started this project. Civitas describes this project as a reaction to the now lampooned claim of a ‘vast right wing conspiracy’, but the numbers tell the true reality (emphasis added):

The accusations stumped us because it was hard to come up with even 10 conservative/libertarian advocacy organizations in North Carolina at the time. In the end, the accusations led us to count the organizations on the Left.

The results were stunning. Our research uncovered a well-funded army of more than 140 organizations involving more than 1,800 people working to enlarge state government and erode our freedoms.

 

Read the whole introductory piece. The article goes on to illustrate how Mapping The Left works with the example of the Z. Smith Reynolds Foundation and exposing the $62 million Z. Smith has pumped into a network of progressive left non-profits. Civitas lists 7 networks identified so far as BlueprintNC, Democracy NC, Together NC, HKonJ, Moral Monday, Acorn and Z. Smith Reynolds.

Mapping The Left allows the user to search by people, funders, groups and networks. I played with the site a while this morning, which gives you a bird’s-eye view of the connections or you can zoom in and drill down to specific circles.

Posted in A.P. Dillon (LL1885), POLITICS NC | 1 Comment

Dueling Narratives In #NC02

Color me confused as to what Rep. Ellmers is doing with regards to abortion in NC-02.

Related Reads:

Ellmers Position on Abortion

Renee Ellmers leads GOP’s Cave On Abortion on Eve of March for Life

Renee Ellmers Says She Won’t Flip-Flop on Bill Protecting Viable Infants from Late-Term Abortion

US Rep. Renee Ellmers wavers, then says she will support abortion bill

Big Govt. Barbie: thumbing nose at voters, winning praise from femi-nazis

Posted in A.P. Dillon (LL1885), GOP | Tagged , | 3 Comments

Former NC Board of Ed Chair Not Really Keen On 10 Pt Grading Scale

Former NC State Board of Education Chairman, Howard Lee, was asked about the new 10 pt grading system North Carolina is adopting.  Lee doesn’t see a “downside to it” but would prefer the grading scale “the way it was”.

View the clip here: After SPIN! 1/18/15 – “What do you think of the 10-point grading scale?”

Reminder: The A-F  grading system originated with Jeb Bush’s Foundation for Excellence in Education. Again I ask, who is driving education in North Carolina?

Related Reads:
Jeb Bush education foundation played leading role in mixing politics, policy

10-Point Grading Scale: A Trojan Horse

 

Posted in A.P. Dillon (LL1885), EDUCATION, NC Board Of Education, Video | Tagged | Comments Off on Former NC Board of Ed Chair Not Really Keen On 10 Pt Grading Scale