4th Court Rules in Favor of Feelings, Not Facts – #hb2

ConsequencesThe 4th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled yesterday that a lawsuit involving a transgender student suing under Title IX can go forward and sent it back to a lower court.

The court seems to be saying your feelings are what matter, not your actual biology. They’ve seemingly ruled in favor of feelings, not facts. The slippery slope just got more slippery.

Read the Ruling here.

Pay attention to the dissenting opinion from Judge Niemeyer starting on page 47, which in part says, “This unprecedented holding overrules custom, culture, and the very demands inherent in human nature for privacy and 48 safety, which the separation of such facilities is designed to protect. More particularly, it also misconstrues the clear language of Title IX and its regulations. And finally, it reaches an unworkable and illogical result.”

The student, Gavin Grimm, is female but ‘identifies’ as male. Grimm had been using the boys bathrooms until parents complained.

The school district made separate accommodations available to Grimm, but that wasn’t good enough. Grimm insisted on using the boys bathroom and subsequently sued.

News and Record has an AP report and they include this tidbit:

A federal judge had previously rejected Grimm’s sex discrimination claim, but the court said that judge ignored a U.S. Department of Education regulation that transgender students in public schools must be allowed to use the restroom that corresponds with their gender identity.

First, it’s not a U.S. Department of Education “regulation”.

The U.S. Department of Education sent out a nonbinding letter on this topic.  There is no federal law including transgender persons  or gender identity.  This is interpretation.

Judge Neimeyer even points out there is no federal law supporting this, stating in his dissent that, “The recent Office for Civil Rights letter, moreover, which is not law but which is the only authority on which the majority relies, states more than the majority acknowledges.”

Neimeyer goes on to point out that Title IX is not ambiguous, writing that, “Title IX and its implementing regulations are not ambiguous. In recognition of physiological privacy and safety concerns, they allow schools to provide “separate living facilities for the different sexes,” 20 U.S.C. § 1686, provided that the facilities are “proportionate” and “comparable,” 34 C.F.R. § 106.32(b), and to provide “separate toilet, locker room, and shower facilities on the basis of sex,” again provided that the facilities are “comparable,” 34 C.F.R. § 106.33.”

Title IX says in part that, “No person in the United States shall, on the basis of sex, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any education program or activity receiving federal financial assistance.”

The U.S. Department of Education interpreting Title IX. Just like OSHA and the EEOC have interpreted protections to include transgender persons.

Title IX was meant to protect females from exclusion, not force inclusion of a male, who in their head, claims they are female.

 

There is a clear action states can take: Refuse Title IX funding.

READ:
6 Myths About Allowing Transgender Students to Use Restrooms of the Opposite Sex
McCrory Steps Up, Joins Amicus Brief Sans Cooper

Related:  How far the Democrats have come from ‘protecting’ women to now openly promoting a war on them.

Advertisements

About A.P. Dillon

A.P. Dillon is a Co-Founder and Managing Editor at American Lens. She resides in the Triangle area of North Carolina and is the founder of LadyLiberty1885.com. Her past writing can also be found at IJ review, Breitbart, FOX news, Da Tech Guy Blog, Heartland Institute, Civitas Institute and StopCommonCoreNC.org. Find her on Twitter: @APDillon_
This entry was posted in Education, LadyLiberty1885, Legal Related, The Articles, You Will Be Made To Care and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to 4th Court Rules in Favor of Feelings, Not Facts – #hb2

  1. Pingback: NC Officials Present Unified Front In Face Of DOJ Threats – #HB2 | Lady Liberty 1885

  2. Pingback: HB2 Lawsuit’s Poster Boy | Lady Liberty 1885

  3. bigalsouth says:

    Thanks for pointing out in an earlier post that the ACLU, in their lawsuit against HB2, admitted their clients had a “serious medical condition” recognized under the APA as a “mental illness.” In the majority opinion in the Virginia bathroom case, the judge wrote:

    Further, using the girls’ restroom would “cause severe psychological distress” to
    G.G. and would be incompatible with his treatment for gender dysphoria.

    Two Federal judges refer to a high school girl as “he” because of her mental illness. We’ve all jumped on board the bullet train headed for Crazy Town.

  4. brackenkaren says:

    Law, facts, truth have no meaning anymore and this too has been part of the agenda to destroy all decency in this country and eventually the country itself. The sad part is the LGBT community is being used to promote an agenda that has nothing to do with helping these people. They are being used to promote something so sinister most people wouldn’t believe it if you showed them facts staring them right in their faces. When they are done with the LGBT community they will be cast aside like all useful idiots. They use the poor, the minorities and now the LGBT community to push their evil agenda. This is why we have to fight now to stop it. We are not fighting against these people we are fighting the real hidden agenda that underlies what is taking place.

Comments are closed.