Heartland Article: ‘Regressive’ Cigarette Tax Hike Proposed by California Lawmakers

This article first appeared at Heartland.org on October 13th.



Regressive’ Cigarette Tax Hike Proposed by California Lawmakers

Lawmakers in California are proposing increasing the sin tax on cigarettes by $2 per pack to fund proposed increases in entitlement spending.

The proposed tax hike would also affect sales of e-cigarettes. Lawmakers project the tax hike will bring in $1.5 billion in additional revenue.

Michael LaFaive, director of the Mackinac Center for Public Policy’s Morey Fiscal Policy Initiative, says the tax hike may reduce cigarette sales in the state, but not for the reasons lawmakers think.

‘Evasion and Avoidance’

“There is no question in my mind that legal sales will drop,” LaFaive said. “So the question is, by what degree will it drop as a result of people quitting, which is a positive, and [by] what percent will it drop because of illicit activities: the evasion and avoidance?

“From what we’ve seen earlier, … up to 85 percent of the change in legal paid sales after an excise tax increase [is] the result of tax avoidance and not of quitting,” LaFaive said.

All Downside

William Shughart II, a research director at the Independent Institute, says the tax hike is bad news for California taxpayers.

“The type of revenue that is raised will be raised on the backs of the lowest-income households in California,” Shughart said. “It’s worth emphasizing that in this particular case the typical taxpayer is going to be from a low-income household.”

Politics, Not Public Health

Shughart says sin tax revenues are often used for purposes other than promoting public health.

“[People] might think, falsely, that money is going to be used for a good purpose,” Shughart said. “But it turns out that all these taxes and kinds of excise taxes on cigarettes and lots of earmarked tax revenues, just like the highway trust fund, … public politicians raid them all the time. Because they won’t want to spend the money on something else, so they pull the money out of trust funds, put in a bond or take a federal bond, and then transfer the money to something that buys them more votes than the original purpose for which the tax was created.”

Andrea Dillon (thell1885@gmail.com) writes from Holly Springs, North Carolina.

Internet Info:

Jerry G. Thursby and Marie C. Thursby,  “Interstate Cigarette Bootlegging: Extent, Revenue Losses, and Effects of Government Intervention,” National Bureau of Economic Research:https://www.heartland.org/policy-documents/interstate-cigarette-bootlegging-extent-revenue-losses-and-effects-government-inter/

Advertisements

About A.P. Dillon

A.P. Dillon is a Co-Founder and Managing Editor at American Lens. She resides in the Triangle area of North Carolina and is the founder of LadyLiberty1885.com. Her past writing can also be found at IJ review, Breitbart, FOX news, Da Tech Guy Blog, Heartland Institute, Civitas Institute and StopCommonCoreNC.org. Find her on Twitter: @APDillon_
This entry was posted in Heartland, LadyLiberty1885 and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.