Change Is…

4 years later, still running against Palin…

This is just to annoy the troll currently stalking the post I made on the attack video the Obama campaign just did on Palin:

About A.P. Dillon

A.P. Dillon is a freelance journalist and is currently writing at The North State Journal. She resides in the Triangle area of North Carolina. Find her on Twitter: @APDillon_
This entry was posted in New Civility, Obama, The Articles, THE LEFT and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Change Is…

  1. troll eh? And yet is you who continue to post information that you know is false. You know damn well Obama can not contact a superpac. And you know damn well that maher did not give money directly to Obama. And yet you continue posting insinuating that Obama is responsible.

    How about this- please show me one law or bill Obama, or the democrats, has proposed that is disrescpectful to women. To compare with the republicans attacks on funding for planned parenthood – causing multiple offices to close in the past 6 motns alone (despite their claims women don’t need health insurance for contraception- they can get it from planned parenthood). The republicans continued attacks on a womans right to abortion- including the vile attempts in Virginia to force an inter-vaginal sonogram. Republicans trying to change the definition of rape in some states. BLocking of women from speaking on womens health issues before congress… shall I go on?

    Like

    • Yes, A troll. Repeating the same talking points over and over in variation with an increasingly shrill tone and thinking it will make them true, while learning nothing, is trolling.
      You keep talking about the Super-PAC like it’s in some kind of untouchable bubble. How naive. I’ve also pointed how who posted and paid for that video on Palin, which you are choosing to ignore. Very well, carry on – it doesn’t fit your narrative.

      The Democrats have manufactured the war on women. Obama cannot run on his record – it’s the worst of any president in our history – therefore he has begun dragging out every social issue he can think of. His administration has violated the law and Constitution on multiple occasions, all in the name of “shared sacrifice”. He’s an occupy faculty lounge type surrounded by only people he chooses and that agree with him and who is in over his head, yet is determined to ‘fundamentally transform’ this country – and not for the better, but for the most ‘fair’ result.

      Planned Parenthood refuses to open their books, by the way, so it is impossible to see what money is spent where. I am personally opposed to them getting public funds. I do not support what is essentially an abortion mill that provides pap smears on the side. You can spare me the poor women need this or that story, because PP and medicaid provide the same list of services, difference being that medicaid actually does mammograms. The Planned Parenthood debacle had nothing to do with Republicans and everything to do with Liberals seizing on Komen making a business decision. They used it as their test run. Consider the pressure brought to bear, the letter campaigns, the smears, the hacking of the Komen site. It was a brute force exercise in silencing dissenters. So began the Democrats manufactured war on women — the lesson being, women have a choice so long as they choose what we want them to.

      Then consider his HHS mandate, which violates the 1st Amendment concerning Religious Freedom and includes abortifacients. By the way, abortion is not a right. Liberals love yelling something is a “right”. I do not think that word means what you think it means.

      The Virginia law did not mandate the trans-vaginal ultrasound (it’s not intra-vaginal anymore than we have an Inter-continental railroad as Obama claims). Go read the actual law? By the way, it passed and was signed. Should the trans-vaginal be needed, it is no more invasive than a regular exam with a speculum. Funny we don’t hear these same women yelling they are being violated then. Claiming it is too traumatic is rather absurd considering the abortion procedure they are planning to have is a hundred times worse. What a horror that women might have to actually SEE what they are about to kill.

      No one blocked anyone from speaking in front of Congress. That statement is rather offensive given this post goes back to Sandra Fluke? Come off it. No one blocked them on the initial panel either. That is one of Nancy Pelosi’s little charades that has already been blown wide open. You need to read more.

      The Republicans on H.R. 3 – Read about it here: http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-h3/show
      It was not redefining Rape, but rather the circumstances under which abortions could be performed using public money (medicaid). Since Liberals insist everyone else pay for their sex lives from contraception to abortion, I think it was well past time someone stood up and said no. Here is the full summary:

      3/17/2011–Reported to House amended, Part I. No Taxpayer Funding for Abortion Act – Prohibits the expenditure of funds authorized or appropriated by federal law or funds in any trust fund to which funds are authorized or appropriated by federal law (federal funds) for any abortion. Prohibits federal funds from being used for any health benefits coverage that includes coverage of abortion. (Currently, federal funds cannot be used for abortion services and plans receiving federal funds must keep federal funds segregated from any funds for abortion services.) Disallows any tax benefits for amounts paid or incurred for an abortion. Prohibits the inclusion of abortion in any health care service furnished by a federal or District of Columbia health care facility or by any physician or other individual employed by the federal government or the District. Provides that such prohibitions shall not apply to an abortion if:
      (1) the pregnancy is the result of rape or incest; or
      (2) the woman suffers from a physical disorder, injury, or illness, including a life-endangering physical condition caused by or arising from the pregnancy itself, that would place her in danger of death unless an abortion is performed, as certified by a physician. Makes such prohibitions applicable to District funds. Creates a cause of action for any violations of the abortion provisions of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA). Gives federal courts jurisdiction to prevent and redress actual or threatened violations of such provisions by issuing any form of legal or equitable relief, including an injunction or order preventing the disbursement of all or a portion of federal financial assistance until the prohibited conduct has ceased. Gives standing to institute an action to affected health care entities and the Attorney General. Requires the Secretary of Health and Human Services to designate the Director of the Office for Civil Rights of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) to receive, investigate, and refer to the appropriate federal agency complaints alleging a violation of PPACA abortion provisions.

      So yes, go on. Nothing you’ve posted is accurate yet. Keep trying.

      Like

Comments are closed.